Day 12: Sticky Wages

Keynes blames the stickiness of wages for distortions in the job market, which affect employment rates. Looking at the trends exhibited by the economy during the Great Recession of 2008, nominal wages couldn't decrease owing to the sticky nature of wages. Companies responded by increasing lay-offs to cut costs without reducing the wages of the remaining employees.

Therefore, the popular sticky wage theory postulates that employee pay tends to respond slowly to changes and exhibits resistance to decline even under deteriorating economic conditions. This can be attributed to the fact that workers will fight against a reduction in pay, so a firm will seek to reduce costs elsewhere. In a case of rising unemployment, wages of those workers who remain employed tend to stay the same or grow at a slower rate instead of decreasing with a decline in labour demand. Thus, wages are "sticky-down" as they can move up easily but experience difficulty moving down. Real wages are instead eroded through the effects of inflation.

This is a very sound theory as in reality, workers are naturally more open to pay raises than pay cuts. Companies, too, don't challenge this as they want to prevent any hit to their reputation that can be associated with pay cuts and causing dissatisfaction to labour unions.

Comments

Day 10: The Interventionist

Out of all the contributions Keynes has made in the field of Economics, his interventionist approach is probably the one I most agree with. According to Keynes, economies don't stabilize themselves very quickly and require active state intervention to boost short-term demand. Wages and employment too, are slow in their response to the needs of the market, requiring government intervention to keep them on track. I firmly believe that interventionist policies are a massive improvement from the classical inclination to a laissez-faire stance. Such a "leave-it-alone" mentality can be downright harmful for the economy, as absolute autonomy can lead to chaos and mayhem, with private interests taking precedence over overall societal welfare. It also invariably widens the chasms of income inequality. Without government intervention, monopoly power would freely reign and such intervention can regulate markets to function more effectively, as well as cater to public and economic...

Day 9: The Bible of Macroeconomics— The General Theory

Reading Keynes's The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money is a life-changing experience even in the 21st century. This means it was practically explosive during his times. A time dominated by the reigning classicists and their accepted axioms and ideologies, Keynes challenged all these existing theories and his book was a radical reconsideration of some of these founding principles of Economics, provoking a widespread revolution in economic thought. Keynes's affinity and prowess for problem-solving shines throughout this masterpiece of a book. The heart of The General Theory lies in its analysis of poverty and unemployment, which Keynes saw as having permanent and tragic political and economic consequences. According to Keynes, unemployment is not caused by rigidity of wages or prices, but by lack of incentives to increase production, due to lack of effective demand in the short run and lack of knowledge of the future in the long run. Keynes also addressed the ...

Day 5: Fiscal Policy

If Keynes were to take a peek at the economic scenario of the recent past, what would he see? Most households reduced spending in a bid to repay mortgages which were larger than the values of their houses. Though businesses acquired large amounts, they were hesitant to invest owing to decline in the value of assets. Student debt increased, while consumption decreased. Most importantly, governments reduced their spending in light of austerity policies that aimed to reduce public debt. As a result of an overall decrease in spending, national income decreased and so did jobs, which adversely affected global incomes and employment as well. Central banks increased money supply to stimulate spending, but reluctance to spend was at an all-time high. We were experiencing a Keynesian liquidity trap. This situation calls for a fiscal policy rather than a monetary policy. The government's bid to increase money supply rendered ineffective as the policymaker's ...

15 Days of Keynes.

Search This Blog